W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-archive@w3.org > June 2018

Re: [csswg-drafts] Added the first proposal for a 'environment-blending' keyword.

From: CSS Meeting Bot via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2018 16:11:59 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-400735058-1530115918-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
The Working Group just discussed `Add 'environment-blending' keyword`, and agreed to the following:

* `RESOLVED: Add environment-blending to MQ5`

<details><summary>The full IRC log of that discussion</summary>
&lt;dael> Topic: Add 'environment-blending' keyword<br>
&lt;dael> github: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/pull/2719<br>
&lt;dael> cabanier: Hi everyone! I work for Magic Leap and we do an AR headset and we're doing a web browser for that. One of the things in our headset is it's additive. A lot of websites aren't as pleasing to the eye as can be. Bright white background with small text is hard to read. People tend to switch styles. Some people use scripts to change the site and we want them to use MQ to design pages for display technologies.<br>
&lt;dael> cabanier: Originally we called the property reality, but it's for other tech so we came up with environment-blending name. I think fantasai had concerns about virtual reality.<br>
&lt;dael> fantasai: I had a handful of comments on how spec was written. There was a comment on how opaque vs additive...additive was if you're blending with real world but you could belnd the canvas of page with virtual world as well so I was saying description should be adjusted.<br>
&lt;dael> cabanier: So it doesn't need to be real world...real or vitural...like your desktop event<br>
&lt;dael> fantasai: Yeah<br>
&lt;dael> cabanier: Okay. I think we can do that.<br>
&lt;dael> florian: In principle I support. Need to expore details. One thing I was wondering about, if it falls under something desribed...something like an overhead projector slide with a default transparent background.<br>
&lt;fantasai> s/was written/was written, but aside from that../<br>
&lt;dael> cabanier: Like an additive display but you could also add darkness.<br>
&lt;dael> florian: I guess. opaque but default transparent<br>
&lt;fantasai> s/how opaque vs additive...a/opaque vs additive. A/<br>
&lt;dael> cabanier: Yes. I think maybe could add later. Webpages are defined opaque by default and you'd have to change that.<br>
&lt;dael> florian: I didn't want to dive into details, but in wording of options and list of options...we'll need to iterate. MQ5 is fairly speculative to I have no issue adding it there and working with it.<br>
&lt;dael> cabanier: And as I mentioned on PR is you want to see what we're trying to do we have videos on our home page of the things we want to do.<br>
&lt;dael> cabanier: I'll update wording to say real or another virtual<br>
&lt;dael> Rossen_: Sounds good. Sounds like neat feature.<br>
&lt;dael> Rossen_: I'm hearing support to proceeding forward.<br>
&lt;dael> Rossen_: Any other questions/opinions to Rik or should we resolve to continue this in MQ5?<br>
&lt;dael> RESOLVED: Add environment-blending to MQ5<br>
</details>


-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by css-meeting-bot
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/pull/2719#issuecomment-400735058 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 27 June 2018 16:12:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 27 June 2018 16:12:06 UTC