- From: Florian Rivoal via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2018 00:59:51 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Sorry, this needs to be reverted: 1) linking to `css-content` instead of `css2` is not appropriate. `css-content` is a known-to-be buggy draft. It is not as bad as it used to be, as some maintenance work has been done to it, but I don't think it has reached the point where it is more accurate than `css2`. Case in point: it claims that the `content` property applies to all elements, which is absolutely not true in existing implementations. `css2` correctly says that it applies to ":before and :after pseudo-elements " 2) independently of the point above, neither `css-content` nor `css-list-3` are mature enough to be accepted without strong justifications as normative references for a document which is trying to exit CR, so we will have to change these links anyway before next publication of `css-contain` -- GitHub Notification of comment by frivoal Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/pull/2801#issuecomment-399288292 using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 22 June 2018 00:59:54 UTC