- From: Manuel Rego Casasnovas via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2018 11:36:52 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
I've a question about this change, on a [previous comment](https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2177#issuecomment-365732303) you said: > * Content-sized tracks such as `auto` tracks and flexible tracks with a minimum (e.g. `minmax(min-content, 1fr)` honor their minimum and ensure that no item spanning them causes overflow. But the change affects also non-spanning items, see https://drafts.csswg.org/css-grid/#algo-single-span-items: > 2. Size tracks to fit non-spanning items: For each track with an intrinsic track sizing function and not a flexible sizing function, ... Now it says "and not a flexible sizing function" so if we have a non-spanning item on a flexible track. The item could end up overflowing the track as their contents would be ignored. Check the discussion in the following bug for an example: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1381512#c6 Do we really want this behavior for non-spanning items? -- GitHub Notification of comment by mrego Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2177#issuecomment-395734717 using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 8 June 2018 11:36:56 UTC