W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-archive@w3.org > June 2018

Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-ui-4] Require link-pointer when pointer is over a link

From: CSS Meeting Bot via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2018 23:14:50 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-395243086-1528326889-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
The Working Group just discussed `Require link-pointer when pointer is over a link`, and agreed to the following:

* `RESOLVED: accept the suggestion in the issue plus a prefix for unless otherwise specified for UI 4`

<details><summary>The full IRC log of that discussion</summary>
&lt;dael> Topic: Require link-pointer when pointer is over a link<br>
&lt;dael> github: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2664#issuecomment-388344661<br>
&lt;dael> florian: CSS UI defines what a link pointer looks like but doesn't say it has to apply to links, esp. Cchrome noticed they don't apply in SVG. Chrome fixed itself. I think we have interop, not 100% sure on Edge. Request is UI spec says there needs to be something in UA stylesheet instructing browser to use link in the link format for that style of document.<br>
&lt;dael> florian: Seems reasonable. AmeliaBR approved. What do you all think?<br>
&lt;dael> fremy: I would recommened we say we recommend it to be there. I don't think we can require it. I don't think we should be normative on other doc formats.<br>
&lt;tantek_> UA stylesheet suggestions in CSS UI are non-normative anyway<br>
&lt;dael> florian: So we can either put it as a note or say unless otherwise specificed.<br>
&lt;dael> fremy: Second is good.<br>
&lt;dael> florian: Same sentence from the issue with the prefix.<br>
&lt;dael> astearns: [reads tantek_ IRC] Is that the case?<br>
&lt;tantek_> https://www.w3.org/TR/css-ui-3/#default-style-sheet<br>
&lt;tantek_> This appendix is informative.<br>
&lt;tantek_> so should it be in css-ui-4<br>
&lt;dael> florian: Draft has appendix with non-normative UA stylesheet suggestions. I'm not suggesting writing a stylesheet, but creating a requirement for other UA stylesheets.<br>
&lt;dael> astearns: Other opinions?<br>
&lt;dael> florian: Yes, level 4 not 3.<br>
&lt;tantek_> and keep the UA stylesheet in an informative appendix<br>
&lt;dael> astearns: fremy you're okay with the wording in the issue plus the prefix?<br>
&lt;dael> fremy: Yeah, why not?<br>
&lt;AmeliaBR> The SVG user-agent stylesheet would be the normative spec (https://svgwg.org/svg2-draft/styling.html#UAStyleSheet). But good to have consistent guidance from CSS.<br>
&lt;dael> astearns: Objections to the suggestion in the issue plus a prefix for unless otherwise specified<br>
&lt;dael> RESOLVED: accept the suggestion in the issue plus a prefix for unless otherwise specified for UI 4<br>
</details>


-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by css-meeting-bot
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2664#issuecomment-395243086 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 6 June 2018 23:14:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 6 June 2018 23:14:54 UTC