- From: Florian Rivoal via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2018 08:56:34 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
If necessary, I'm happy to add this in the mq spec, but redundant normative prose isn't good, so I want to make sure we're not covered already. If we are, a note is enough, if not, we should add normative prose. If you think we are good thanks to V&U already, please explain how, 'cause I don't see how that statements covers us. -- GitHub Notification of comment by frivoal Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2727#issuecomment-394282955 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 4 June 2018 08:56:36 UTC