W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-archive@w3.org > June 2018

Re: [csswg-drafts] [selectors] Proposal for `:event:then(:event)` selector

From: jonjohnjohnson via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2018 23:51:46 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-394037542-1527897106-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
@Lcfvs My suggestion of `:blurred` surely isn't flexible and was only brought up to solve the use case above. Something easier to get consensus on than the possible complexities `:event()`.

@c-smile In your suggestion, I'm guessing a pseudos transition "out" would take precedence over the transition value for a selector that matches the element without that pseudo class?

-> https://css-tricks.com/a-specificity-battle/

This all sounds like it may be pigeonholing some sort of poorman's version of "events" into the "statefulness" of css pseudo-classes? Especially when I see all the headway made by the csswg animation folks, though I may be missing something.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by jonjohnjohnson
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2725#issuecomment-394037542 using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 1 June 2018 23:51:56 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 19 September 2019 01:18:58 UTC