- From: Tobi Reif via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2018 17:37:15 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> it also just rules out certain nice classes of parsers The syntax should be nice for its users. I don't think I should have to care about whether the parser is nice or not 😀 > Bounded lookahead is very convenient I think that the syntax should be very convenient for its users / for web developers. The potential performance hit should get verified before the API makes amends - the actual perf hit in real-world stylesheets might be negligible. -- GitHub Notification of comment by tobireif Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2701#issuecomment-393954475 using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 1 June 2018 17:37:23 UTC