W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-archive@w3.org > January 2018

Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-fonts] Should font-synthesis be reset by font shorthand?

From: Chris Lilley via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2018 22:28:37 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-360622033-1516919316-sysbot+gh@w3.org>

@upsuper do you agree with tab that this should not reset?


-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by svgeesus
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1032#issuecomment-360622033 using your GitHub account

Received on Thursday, 25 January 2018 22:28:40 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Chris Lilley via GitHub: "Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-fonts-3] Is the exclusion of calc() from @font-feature-values intentional?"
Previous message: Chris Lilley via GitHub: "Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css-fonts] @font-face doesn't accept individual font-variant-* descriptors"
In reply to: [ message archived in another list or period ]
Next in thread: Xidorn Quan via GitHub: "Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-fonts] Should font-synthesis be reset by font shorthand?"
Maybe reply: Xidorn Quan via GitHub: "Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-fonts] Should font-synthesis be reset by font shorthand?"
Maybe reply: Chris Lilley via GitHub: "Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-fonts] Should font-synthesis be reset by font shorthand?"
Maybe reply: Chris Lilley via GitHub: "Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-fonts] Should font-synthesis be reset by font shorthand?"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 06:41:23 UTC