Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-fonts-4] Support Font Collection File Formats

Unfortunately though your spec is non-authoritative, and also wrong.

> One proposal I've heard is to use indices inside the fragment identifier

We went away from that on the advice of Ken Lunde, who pointed out that when collections are revised the extra fonts are inserted, not allway appended - so numbers as fragment identifiers are fragile. Instead we use the PostScript name (as is already used for local font descriptors).

See section 4.4.4 of RFC8081

The examples in Fonts-3 and Fonts-4 should be updated to the correct syntax. I'm happy to do that.

GitHub Notification of comment by svgeesus
Please view or discuss this issue at using your GitHub account

Received on Friday, 19 January 2018 19:46:21 UTC