I'm not sure what the reference to S-B trees is about. Can you elaborate? I presume the underlying desire is the ability to order some child C between two other children A and B, without having to make sure that A and B's `order` values are separated by more than 1? (That is, is A has `order: 1;` and B has `order: 2`, there's currently no way to put C between the two of them reliably without just changing A and/or B's `order` values.) If that's the case, I agree with the desire, and would like `order` (and `z-index`, for that matter) to accept a *list* of values, and resolve them in lexicographic order. That way, given A and B as set up above, you could give C an `order: 1 1` or `order: 2 -1` to either place it after A or before B (which are implicitly specifying `0` for later indexes). -- GitHub Notification of comment by tabatkins Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2202#issuecomment-358762331 using your GitHub accountReceived on Thursday, 18 January 2018 19:53:17 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 06:41:23 UTC