W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-archive@w3.org > January 2018

Re: [csswg-drafts] [selectors-4] reconsider specificity rule for :matches()

From: Tab Atkins Jr. via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2018 22:18:14 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-358126341-1516141093-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
> [`:matches(.a .b .c, .d .e .f)`] isn't very verbose. Consider `.a .b .c :matches(.d .e .f)`, which can be very verbose.

Oh shoot, you're right, I meant to write `:matches(.a .b .c):matches(.d .e .f)`, not a single comma-separated one. (As written, my example is equivalent to a plain `.a .b .c, .d .e .f` selector list.)  

GitHub Notification of comment by tabatkins
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1027#issuecomment-358126341 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 16 January 2018 22:18:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 06:41:23 UTC