Re: [csswg-drafts] [selectors-4] reconsider specificity rule for :matches()

> [`:matches(.a .b .c, .d .e .f)`] isn't very verbose. Consider `.a .b .c :matches(.d .e .f)`, which can be very verbose.

Oh shoot, you're right, I meant to write `:matches(.a .b .c):matches(.d .e .f)`, not a single comma-separated one. (As written, my example is equivalent to a plain `.a .b .c, .d .e .f` selector list.)  

GitHub Notification of comment by tabatkins
Please view or discuss this issue at using your GitHub account

Received on Tuesday, 16 January 2018 22:18:20 UTC