@ewilligers If we're using the “If omitted it defaults to closest-side” clause to justify the singe `<shape-radius>` case, then it would mean a single `<shape-radius>` expands to that in one axis and `closest-side` in the other. Then it's unspecified which side, but also it's inconsistent with how CSS works, where an omitted second value is doubled. So clearly something needs to be fixed in the spec here! What's the implemented behavior so far? :) -- GitHub Notification of comment by fantasai Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2175#issuecomment-357313507 using your GitHub accountReceived on Friday, 12 January 2018 18:13:12 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 06:41:23 UTC