- From: Majid Valipour via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2018 19:23:07 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Great. It seems that we should hopefully be able to have @bgirard continue as the editor if chair does not object. Setting that question aside, I see now that this is scheduled to be on the agenda. So I believe we just wait for WG to approve. I just wanted to add a few minor notes/questions on the migration process: - The spec in already in bikeshed so it should not need a lot of formatting change. But it may be valuable to have a csswg expert to do a review to ensure we are doing the right thing e.g., linking to the appropriate concepts etc. Probably best to happen after migration. - There are two small open issues. It will be nice if we close them before migration but otherwise we need to migrate those as well. - I know of at least one specification, [scroll-anchoring](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-scroll-anchoring/), that has gone from wicg->csswg-draft. So WICG folks may already have a well established process. Here is more [details](https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/676#issuecomment-296109835). - Is there a way to keep commit history remain intact? It will be nice but I am not sure how given that this is not just a matter or moving the repo across organizations. This is not critical though since the spec is not very old. -- GitHub Notification of comment by majido Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2179#issuecomment-357033565 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 11 January 2018 19:23:12 UTC