- From: Nadya678 via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2018 12:30:24 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
What the draft interfere with current webpages where p::first-line:hover means p:hover::first-line? If the pseudoclasses will be permitted for pseudoelements, I guess for previous [solution](https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2007). But if p::first-line:hover will not be equivalent of p:hover::first-line the pages may start to display wrongly. **"NO" for IE5-based scrollbars.** Many commenters [here ](https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2007)also said NO for IE based solution. > "purely decorative things" If they are a decorative elements, they should have 0 width but in Chrome, Firefox and IE they makes extra gap in the layout. They are decorative on mobile versions of browsers. -- GitHub Notification of comment by Nadya678 Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2153#issuecomment-355544131 using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 5 January 2018 12:30:27 UTC