W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-archive@w3.org > January 2018

Closed: [csswg-drafts] [selectors-4] should the >> syntax for the descendant combinator still exist?

From: fantasai via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2018 07:27:46 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issues.closed-184960426-1515050865-sysbot+gh@w3.org>

fantasai closed this issue. See https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/641

Received on Thursday, 4 January 2018 07:27:49 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: fantasai via GitHub: "Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-values] Cyclic definitions with relative units"
Previous message: fantasai via GitHub: "Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-timing-1][css-transitions-1] <single-*> seems excessively specific"
In reply to: [ message archived in another list or period ]

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 06:41:22 UTC