Re: [csswg-drafts] [selectors4] Name the “functional pseudo-class like :matches() with 0 specificity” from fantasai via GitHub on 2018-01-04 (public-css-archive@w3.org from January 2018)

From: fantasai via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2018 07:21:25 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-355214924-1515050483-sysbot+gh@w3.org>

> Thankfully, we have a resolution on this, so my time can be spent more productively. Can we please focus on the name?

I'm not disputing that we should have this feature, just the frequency with which it would be needed that is driving you to require its name to be two characters.

> I think @SelenIT made an excellent point about :is() being an acronym for Ignore Specificity.

And as you so often like to point out, nobody reads documentation, so my point about the misleading pairing stands.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by fantasai
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2143#issuecomment-355214924 using your GitHub account

Received on Thursday, 4 January 2018 07:21:33 UTC