- From: Koji Ishii via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2018 03:30:35 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
One more example of inconsistency, from [EastAsianWidth.txt]: > 2295;A # Sm CIRCLED PLUS > 2296..2298;N # Sm [3] CIRCLED MINUS..CIRCLED DIVISION SLASH EAW is about legacy encoding. As Ken suggested, when we start using EAW=A in whitespace collapsing, or maybe even W too, we will need to live with some level of inconsistencies. I mean, I'm still fine whether we use EAW=A or not to use EAW=A, each has improved cases and each has additional inconsistencies. Haven't investigated which is net plus. But I wish us not to try more. [EastAsianWidth.txt]: https://www.unicode.org/Public/UNIDATA/EastAsianWidth.txt -- GitHub Notification of comment by kojiishi Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/337#issuecomment-448084260 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 18 December 2018 03:30:37 UTC