W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-archive@w3.org > December 2018

Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-fonts] Clarify what ligatures are optional (#2644)

From: fantasai via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2018 00:14:44 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-445077459-1544141683-sysbot+gh@w3.org>

@bungeman Agreed 100% that those changes you requested to feature-precedence #4 are necessary.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by fantasai
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2644#issuecomment-445077459 using your GitHub account

Received on Friday, 7 December 2018 00:14:45 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: fantasai via GitHub: "Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-text] cursive shaping breaks needs better scoping (#698)"
Previous message: botmad via GitHub: "Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-display-3] grid/flex layout support for <fieldset> (#321)"
Maybe in reply to: bungeman via GitHub: "Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-fonts] Clarify what ligatures are optional (#2644)"
Next in thread: Chris Lilley via GitHub: "Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-fonts] Clarify what ligatures are optional (#2644)"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 06:41:40 UTC