- From: Meteor0id via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2018 14:51:48 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
It might solve my problem, however would it not make more semantic sense to have a property which may be applied on any element? `child-contain: border-box;` (Instructs that the margins of any child element will not be contained, but the borders and padding will be. Margins still have affect between children.) Other options: `child-contain: padding-box;` (margin and border of any child element will overflow) `child-contain: margin-box;` (default, contain every part of child elements) not sure if `child-contain: content-box;` will have a use case. When gap is introduced, the issue has been addressed for flex boxes, but why not introduce a more general property which may apply on all relatively or statically positioned elements? -- GitHub Notification of comment by Meteor0id Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2848#issuecomment-415974460 using your GitHub account
Received on Saturday, 25 August 2018 14:51:50 UTC