- From: CSS Meeting Bot via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2018 16:51:47 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
The Working Group just discussed `'overflow-block' and 'block-overflow' are too similar`, and agreed to the following: * `RESOLVED: Rename overflow to block-ellipsis. Rename auto to none. Rename ellipsis behavior to auto` <details><summary>The full IRC log of that discussion</summary> <dael> Topic: 'overflow-block' and 'block-overflow' are too similar<br> <dael> github: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2561<br> <fantasai> https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2561#issuecomment-413144634<br> <dael> Rossen: florian is not here. Dunno if heycam or rachelandrew_ are here<br> <dael> fantasai: I'min favor of accepting proposal in last comment fwiw<br> <dael> Rossen: Other opinions?<br> <dael> rachelandrew_: I'd agree<br> <astearns> +1 to block-ellipsis<br> <dael> Rossen: Rename overflow to block-ellipsis. Rename auto to none. Rename ellipsis behavior to auto<br> <dael> rachelandrew_: Yes I agree [missed]<br> <dael> rachelandrew_: I agree and as Imentioned in comments I wrote docs for MDN and this seemed sensible way to explain it<br> <dael> Rossen: We can try and resolve. Objections to Rename overflow to block-ellipsis. Rename auto to none. Rename ellipsis behavior to auto<br> <dael> RESOLVED: Rename overflow to block-ellipsis. Rename auto to none. Rename ellipsis behavior to auto<br> </details> -- GitHub Notification of comment by css-meeting-bot Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2561#issuecomment-415101324 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 22 August 2018 16:51:48 UTC