Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-overflow-4] Can we add ::nth-page() pseudo-element?

> Ok, lemme close this for now.


> seems we have a dead loop here

We have a problem, but not really a loop. Yes, we won't have a solution until Reading systems implement the feature, but we cannot fix that by defining a different feature to solve the same problem.

What needs to happen is for the feature to be implemented, and you need to convince implementers of that (or to be an implementer). Adding things to a spec does not solve that.

Alternatively, someone could try to make a convincing case that the feature as defined now should not be implemented, should be dropped from the spec, and should be replaced by something else. But we should not be adding multiple solutions to the same problem in the hope that one will be implemented.

GitHub Notification of comment by frivoal
Please view or discuss this issue at using your GitHub account

Received on Wednesday, 15 August 2018 15:57:21 UTC