Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-syntax] preprocessing says to remove CR and FF, but they are then mentioned in a definition

Yes, that's intentional; the diagrams are helpful informative constructions, not normative definitions.  The actual [definition]( of a newline properly states that it's just \n, with a note about the other characters being removed/transformed during parsing, but forcing people to remember that a previous chapter has this sort of stream manipulation when reading a railroad diagram is too much in my opinion.

GitHub Notification of comment by tabatkins
Please view or discuss this issue at using your GitHub account

Received on Thursday, 9 August 2018 17:44:15 UTC