Thanks for bringing this to my attention. The current definition of `speech` is lousy, as screen readers, which it claims should match it, are a better fit for `screen` (plus some extra capabilities), since they do work on the result of a visual layout. If that's really what it's for, it should be deprecated, because it is wrong. If we want to use it for a set of user agents completely disjoint from visual UAs (e.g. “Siri/Alexa, read me the wikipedia page about strawman arguments”), then it would make some more sense as a media type. Which still leaves us with a question of whether anyone implements that. Either way, it should not stay the way it is. @tabatkins Any thoughts? Who do we get in touch with to know if they are interested in this for pure-speach UAs (not screen readers)? -- GitHub Notification of comment by frivoal Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1751#issuecomment-332096272 using your GitHub accountReceived on Tuesday, 26 September 2017 06:10:05 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 06:41:18 UTC