W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-archive@w3.org > September 2017

Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-values] Radians considered useless without π

From: Christoph Päper via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2017 20:32:22 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-329288272-1505334732-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
The use case was being able to write angles in CSS almost verbatim like everyone does in mathematics. The WG’s resolution is to make authors accept an unfamiliar factor of 2 every time, because that saves each implementor one man-hour or so once.

I just wish the CSS WG would adopt HTML’s [Priority of Constituencies](https://www.w3.org/TR/html-design-principles/#priority-of-constituencies), because with proposals like this I want the language to become more author-friendly. All I’m ever getting as an answer is a polite variant of “fuck you”.

GitHub Notification of comment by Crissov
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/309#issuecomment-329288272 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 13 September 2017 20:32:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 06:41:18 UTC