W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-archive@w3.org > September 2017

Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-writing-modes][css-values] Font metrics calculation on elements which writing-mode doesn't apply to

From: CSS Meeting Bot via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2017 16:38:13 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-329225574-1505320683-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
The Working Group just discussed `Font metrics calculation on elements which writing-mode doesn't apply to`, and agreed to the following resolutions:

* `RESOLVED: Add a clarifying note referencing cascade and then close issue #1782`

<details><summary>The full IRC log of that discussion</summary>
&lt;dael> Topic: Font metrics calculation on elements which writing-mode doesn't apply to<br>
&lt;dael> github: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1782#issuecomment-328222293<br>
&lt;dael> astearns: There's a proposed change and I think dbaron had a comment this might be covered?<br>
&lt;dael> fantasai: Possible.<br>
&lt;dael> dbaron: There is text in 2.1 saying applies to doesn't effect computed unless it explicitly says it does.<br>
&lt;dael> fantasai: That's fair. Do we need to clarify in spec?<br>
&lt;dael> dbaron: Possibly. That also feels like it should be in l3<br>
&lt;dael> fantasai: There isn't a L3 of that chapter<br>
&lt;dael> dbaron: It's in definition of computed value which I think would be cascade. I didn't really look at that.<br>
&lt;dael> dbaron: Actually, it's in. I think it's okay<br>
&lt;dael> fantasai: You rec close no change?<br>
&lt;dael> dbaron: I think so unless someone sees something else?<br>
&lt;dael> astearns: Would a note make sense?<br>
&lt;dael> astearns: Fo rimpl clarity?<br>
&lt;dael> fantasai: I can change the proposed text into a note and reference cascade<br>
&lt;dael> astearns: Obj to add a note?<br>
&lt;dael> dbaron: sgtm<br>
&lt;dael> fantasai: If there's a suggestion on section, we can figure that out. I might stick it in module interactions.<br>
&lt;dael> astearns: Sounds alright.<br>
&lt;dael> RESOLVED: Add a clarifying note referencing cascade and then close issue #1782<br>
</details>


-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by css-meeting-bot
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1782#issuecomment-329225574 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 13 September 2017 16:38:07 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 06:41:18 UTC