- From: Daniel Holbert via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2017 21:46:49 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
dholbert has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts: == [css-flexbox] Flexbox spec uses inconsistent terminology: "Implied Minimum Size" vs "Automatic Minimum Size" == Flexbox Section 4.5 is titled "[Implied Minimum Size of Flex Items](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-flexbox-1/#min-size-auto)" -- however, this term used in the title ("Implied Minimum Size") is **never defined** and has zero usages in the spec's prose, outside of that title (and footnotes about change history). Instead, the spec's prose uses a different term, "Automatic Minimum Size", which was introduced in [this commit]( https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/54c4c0c958537738cdaf005bc4b915105a99de46) and which seems to refer to the exact same concept. Here's a quote, showing the discrepancy: > 4.5. **Implied Minimum Size** of Flex Items > [...] > In general, the **automatic minimum size** of a flex item is ... https://drafts.csswg.org/css-flexbox-1/#min-size-auto For consistency (and to avoid suggesting that there's an additional vaguely-defined concept in play), the title of this section should probably use the same term that we use in the prose -- i.e. the title needs `s/Implied/Automatic/`. The exact same is true of Grid, too, BTW ([section 6.6](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-grid-1/#min-size-auto) over there). > 6.6. **Implied Minimum Size** of Grid Items" > [...] > The **automatic minimum size** for a grid item in a given dimension is ... https://drafts.csswg.org/css-grid-1/#min-size-auto CC @fantasai @tabatkins Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1780 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 5 September 2017 21:46:47 UTC