- From: Koji Ishii via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2017 07:12:55 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Ah, that's one interpretation I can agree now with your explanation, but I can still read it differently, since a "glyph" for me is the one from a font, and I didn't imagine a synthesized graphics is a "glyph". Now I understand the text is a bit ambiguous when the font doesn't have the glyph, or have a glyph that doesn't have a ink. The latter is even more complex, I guess it involves heuristic? I'm curious how Gecko implemented it. This was a request from @gregwhitworth to make browsers interoperable IIUC (correct?), I'm interested to hear which was his intention. -- GitHub Notification of comment by kojiishi Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1990#issuecomment-346262894 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 22 November 2017 07:12:56 UTC