[csswg-drafts] [css-lists] Grammar for counter names should be consistent.

• From: Emilio Cobos Álvarez via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
• Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2017 04:27:33 +0000
• To: public-css-archive@w3.org
• Message-ID: <issues.opened-275052310-1510979252-sysbot+gh@w3.org>

emilio has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts:

== [css-lists] Grammar for counter names should be consistent. ==
https://drafts.csswg.org/css-lists-3/#funcdef-counter says:

> counter( <ident>, [ <counter-style> | none ]? )
> counters( <ident>, <string>, [ <counter-style> | none ]? )

However counter-increment and such say:

> [ <custom-ident> <integer>? ]+ | none 

Looks like `<ident>` and `<custom-ident>` should be used consistently. I suspect we want to use `<custom-ident>` everywhere?

Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1996 using your GitHub account

Received on Saturday, 18 November 2017 04:27:38 UTC