- From: CSS Meeting Bot via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2017 02:02:18 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
The Working Group just discussed `...`. <details><summary>The full IRC log of that discussion</summary> <fantasai> Topic: ...<br> <fantasai> TabAtkins: Definition of what a propdef block means is in 2.1<br> <fantasai> TabAtkins: I would like to move it to someplace better<br> <fantasai> TabAtkins: snapshot's probably the best place for that<br> <Rossen> github: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1867<br> <fantasai> TabAtkins: Problem is defintion of propdef tblesis probably normative<br> <fantasai> TabAtkins: snapshot was decided to be non-normative awhile back<br> <fantasai> TabAtkins: which as other consequences such as the ton of conformance boilerplate that we have to put in every one of our specs<br> <fantasai> Chris: We could hip that spec to other spec liek Value sand Units<br> <fantasai> Chris: Or we can make it non-normative<br> <fantasai> chris: so let's do that<br> <fantasai> Florian: Youc an do that in a Note?<br> <fantasai> Chris: reading prodpef tables isn't really a conformance thing<br> <fantasai> fantasai: but the other bits of boilerplate are<br> <fantasai> Chris: Then, we'll publish the snapshot as a WD, and the a year later when the new snapshot is a WD, turn it into a note<br> <fantasai> flackr: You'l deal with that?<br> <fantasai> Chris: yeah<br> </details> -- GitHub Notification of comment by css-meeting-bot Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1867#issuecomment-342685815 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 8 November 2017 02:02:25 UTC