Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-multicol] Proposal to drop example XVII from CSS Meeting Bot via GitHub on 2017-11-07 (public-css-archive@w3.org from November 2017)

From: CSS Meeting Bot via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 07 Nov 2017 23:47:12 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-342662336-1510098430-sysbot+gh@w3.org>

The Working Group just discussed `Proposal to drop example XVII`, and agreed to the following resolutions:

* `RESOLVED: Remove example XVII`

<details><summary>The full IRC log of that discussion</summary>
&lt;eae> Topic: Proposal to drop example XVII<br>
&lt;eae> github issue: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1740<br>
&lt;eae> rachelandrew: Again, raised in 2013.<br>
&lt;eae> rachelandrew: This example was dropped for reasons mentioned in issue.<br>
&lt;eae> rachelandrew: No resolution.<br>
&lt;eae> rachelandrew: Perhaps needs a clearer example.<br>
&lt;eae> Rossen: OK. Any opinions?<br>
&lt;eae> "If a tall image is moved to a column on the next page to find room for it, its natural column may be left empty. If so, the column is is still considered to have content for the purpose of deciding if the column rule should be drawn."<br>
&lt;eae> RESOLVED: Remove example XVII<br>
</details>


-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by css-meeting-bot
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1740#issuecomment-342662336 using your GitHub account

Received on Tuesday, 7 November 2017 23:47:13 UTC