- From: CSS Meeting Bot via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2017 19:13:33 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
The Working Group just discussed `Transforms 3d contexts`. <details><summary>The full IRC log of that discussion</summary> <TabAtkins> Topic: Transforms 3d contexts<br> <trchen> github issue https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1944<br> <TabAtkins> trchen: In CSS, having a stacking context does not guarantee an element to be a containing block for every descendent element<br> <TabAtkins> trchen: And being a contining block doesn't imply being a stacking context<br> <Rossen> github: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1944<br> <TabAtkins> trchen: 3d context is a stacking concept - it decides which planes need to be 3d-sorted against each other<br> <TabAtkins> trchen: But at the same time we define 3d context of elements based on containing block<br> <TabAtkins> trchen: Causes "3d context penetration problem"<br> <TabAtkins> trchen: Element can be flattened by another element that's not part of its containing block chain<br> <TabAtkins> trchen: We're working on a project in Blink to simplify compsoiting code, foudn some ill-defined corner cases<br> <TabAtkins> trchen: Planning to have a breakout session tomorrow afternoon?<br> <TabAtkins> smfr: Would like to have a browser vendor rep from each for the breakout tomorrow.<br> <TabAtkins> [discuss details of the breakout]<br> <gregwhitworth> bingo update: all 4 rewards are gone :) Thanks for playing<br> <bkardell_> scribenick: bkardell_<br> </details> -- GitHub Notification of comment by css-meeting-bot Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1944#issuecomment-342254042 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 6 November 2017 19:13:37 UTC