- From: Florian Rivoal via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2017 07:11:11 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> This is not confusing enough that it needs to be stated twice. Just fixing the Applies to line seems enough. Done. > Also, stop putting things that don't need WG discussion on the Agenda just because you want my attention. You have my phone number, if you're that desperate you can just call me!!! Sorry, that wasn't the intent. I don't want your attention specifically, I just want feedback in general, and you're not the only editor of that spec. I do appreciate when I get your feedback, but I am not trying to single you out. Since you edit all the specs, I could call you anytime I want feedback on something, but that doesn't scale very well. That said, regardless of intent, if this is irking you, I'm doing it wrong. So point taken, I'll try to be more conservative when adding things to the agenda. -- GitHub Notification of comment by frivoal Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/pull/1864#issuecomment-342064143 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 6 November 2017 07:11:13 UTC