- From: fantasai via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2017 04:41:41 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
It was rejected as “we don't think we want to do this atm”, not as “this is fundamentally incompatible with the model”. The original proposal was to do it with something like `position: namedarea`, since it's a similar concept to abspos. (I think the syntax morphed a few times after Bert's initial proposal to scope the namespace.) On a related note, there was some brief consideration of multiple, overlapping named grids. We ended up with the named lines feature instead. But something to think about maybe. -- GitHub Notification of comment by fantasai Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1375#issuecomment-342045121 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 6 November 2017 04:41:58 UTC