W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-archive@w3.org > November 2017

Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-flexbox][css-sizing] How is flex-basis content size affected by transferred size?

From: Amelia Bellamy-Royds via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2017 23:23:20 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-342014630-1509924199-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
The new definitions in CSS sizing clarify most of the undefined cases.

However, the flexbox spec is still confusing.  The [`flex-basis` definition](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-flexbox/#propdef-flex-basis) links to the [definition of `content` in the `flex` definition](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-flexbox/#valdef-flex-basis-content), but neither of them link to the [definition of `content size` in the minimum sizing section](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-flexbox/#content-size), from where it can be inferred (sort of) that "content" is min-content unless there is a transferred size.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by AmeliaBR
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/694#issuecomment-342014630 using your GitHub account
Received on Sunday, 5 November 2017 23:23:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Sunday, 5 November 2017 23:23:22 UTC