- From: Alan Stearns via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2017 22:55:27 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
I've written these tests that check whether an animated negative calc value is clamped at computed value time (and thus a range of negative values aren't present in the animation) or used value time (where a range of negative values will be present in clamped form for a duration in the animation) https://github.com/astearns/web-platform-tests/commit/da5892fdfb227227c924405467f823b34c33b9a0 The results I'm seeing are all over the place. Pass means clamping is happening at used value time (mostly). Fail means it's clamping at computed value time. width and padding-left have the same results width-up FF, Chrome: pass Safari: fail Edge: no animation width-down FF: pass Safari, Chrome: fail Edge: no animation opacity and font-size have the same results opacity-up Chrome, Edge: pass (though the Chrome animation appears to be incorrect) Safari, FF: fail opacity-down Chrome, Safari, FF, Edge: fail font-size up Chrome: pass FF, Safari: fail Edge: loading problem page (though the animation seems to fail) font-size down Chrome, FF, Safari: fail Edge: no animation -- GitHub Notification of comment by astearns Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/434#issuecomment-341267463 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 1 November 2017 22:55:30 UTC