W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-archive@w3.org > May 2017

[csswg-drafts] [css-align] definition of 'flex-start' and 'flex-end' is wrong for '*-content'

From: L. David Baron via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 19 May 2017 23:33:27 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issues.opened-230112538-1495236806-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
dbaron has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts:

== [css-align] definition of 'flex-start' and 'flex-end' is wrong for '*-content' ==
The [definition of `flex-start`](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-align/#valdef-self-position-flex-start) and [of `flex-end`](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-align/#valdef-self-position-flex-end) currently say:

> 	When used on boxes that are not children of a flex container, this value behaves as start. 

While this is correct for `align-items`, `justify-items`, `align-self`, and `justify-self`, it is not correct for `align-content` and `justify-content`.  (See [flexbox's definition of `align-content`](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-flexbox-1/#propdef-align-content) and [flexbox's definition of `justify-content`](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-flexbox-1/#propdef-justify-content), both of which have "Applies to:" lines specifying flex *containers*, not flex *items*.)

Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1401 using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 19 May 2017 23:33:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 10:12:53 UTC