W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-archive@w3.org > May 2017

Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-overflow] FPWD

From: Tab Atkins Jr. via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 15 May 2017 18:30:55 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-301563193-1494873054-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 8:47 AM, Chris Lilley <notifications@github.com> wrote:
> From today's transition call for css-contain: what is holding us back from FPWD of css-overflow-4 (which is a normative reference from css-contain-1).

Doesn't matter; we don't *actually* depend on anything from
overflow-4, we impose a restriction on some of its features.  This is
just an interaction between the two specs; neither spec, on its own,
depends on the other in any way.

This *is* still property a normative reference; if you implement both
specs, these are indeed normative requirements on the interaction. But
they shouldn't count as holding back Contain.


GitHub Notification of comment by tabatkins
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1374#issuecomment-301563193 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 15 May 2017 18:31:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 10:12:53 UTC