Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-overflow] FPWD

Comments from Ralph Swick:
> Two questions, Chris.  These are probably best addressed in WG discussion.

> 1. What is holding up FPWD for CSS Overflow 4?  An FPWD can state what parts are less (or more) stable but a CR shouldn't depend upon something that is only an editors' draft, especially if the pertinent definitions have been improved.

> 2. Security considerations should include something about risks and counter-measures if a bad actor misuses these new features; e.g. to alter (and misrepresent) what is rendered to the user.

> Would it be appropriate to have some test cases that misuse the features and test what the implementation does in those situations?

GitHub Notification of comment by svgeesus
Please view or discuss this issue at using your GitHub account

Received on Monday, 15 May 2017 17:21:04 UTC