- From: Patrick Dark via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 09:04:35 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
`font-emoji` or `font-variant-emoji` seem to be the most straightforward. Given that change, the value `text` might be better renamed to `none` even though `text` aligns with Unicode. Anything that refers to "presentation" or "glyphs" is too generic since things like `font-variant-east-asian` could also fall under those descriptions. -- GitHub Notification of comment by patrickdark Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1092#issuecomment-288016415 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 21 March 2017 09:04:43 UTC