- From: Xidorn Quan via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2017 00:29:41 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
That way, a lot more questions would be open, e.g. what about `background: url(a) 100%, url(b); background-size: initial;`? Should it be serialized to `background: url(a), url(b);`? Does the latter produce `background-size: initial, initial` or `background-size: initial`? Would `background-size: initial` be identical to e.g. `background-size: initial, initial, initial`? Also, if we allow `initial` as part of a value but not all, should we also allow other CSS-wide keywords to be treated the same way? (WebKit still has an issue that `inherit` can accidentally appear in serialization of shorthands, which seems to have been fixed in Blink.) And would that only apply to lists or any property which can accept multiple tokens? What about tokens inside functions? I didn't say it is not feasible to do that... I just wonder whether it's worth the effort to fix that in the hard way. IIRC, @tabatkins mentioned that he was considering making it possible to cascade individual entry in a list separately, which may change the landscape of how this kind of things should behave. -- GitHub Notification of comment by upsuper Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1068#issuecomment-284276678 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 6 March 2017 00:29:48 UTC