- From: Tab Atkins Jr. via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2017 21:32:56 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Yeah, not sure why we went with the "children of a flex container" wording; we really mean flex items, and things pretending to be flex items (such as when figuring out the static position of an an abspos child of a flex container). New wording in the commit above. -- GitHub Notification of comment by tabatkins Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1402#issuecomment-310508795 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 22 June 2017 21:33:02 UTC