- From: Tab Atkins Jr. via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2017 18:56:01 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Yes, I just rewrote Fonts 4 to use the Syntax productions instead of the old Appendix G productions. Thus my parenthetical about what I "currently have it down as".
My question is about what was intended. The old spec didn't have *anything* between the `@font-palette-values` token and the `{`, because it was a copy-paste from the `@font-face` definition, which puts its name in a descriptor. But all the example show it with an ident there.
So do we want just a `<custom-ident>`? Or a `<family-name>`? Or a `<custom-ident> | <string>`?
(I'd recommend against `<family-name>`; it was a terrible legacy mistake that makes parsing really annoying.)
--
GitHub Notification of comment by tabatkins
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1524#issuecomment-309533649 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 19 June 2017 18:56:08 UTC