- From: Tab Atkins Jr. via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2017 20:28:19 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> The relevant section of syntax should be clearer about what data type A and B are. A and B are defined as integers in the definition of the `<an+b>` type already. > I think the inclusion of the "1" in "1n" goes against the general principle that CSS serialization serializes to the minimal form. I agree, I should drop the 1/-1. It looks like Chrome already does drop it for -1, according to @jyc's table. -- GitHub Notification of comment by tabatkins Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1504#issuecomment-306607112 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 6 June 2017 20:28:25 UTC