- From: L. David Baron via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2017 06:44:58 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
I'm still not OK with this. It's unnecessarily algorithmic, but without any of the stuff surrounding it being at all algorithmic. The vast majority of the spec is written in terms of definitions, and then you have one sentence floating around that's a piece of an algorithm, but the rest of the algorithm isn't present. (Also see "retrieved".) -- GitHub Notification of comment by dbaron Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1448#issuecomment-316288534 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 19 July 2017 06:45:04 UTC