- From: L. David Baron via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2017 00:32:11 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
I'm mostly OK with it, except now you're referring to <code>fit-content</code> sizing in the block axis, and I disagree that such a concept exists (despite that you've put it into sizing). (In the old wording, the block and inline wording was more different.) When it's the block dimension, it needs to be a layout-based size that's used, not an intrinsic size. (The current definitions of intrinsic sizes in the block dimension pretend to do the right thing, except they're not actually intrinsic sizes.) So I'm not OK with this resolution. I think it needs a solution that doesn't introduce a dependency on the fiction of block-dimension intrinsic sizes (which aren't actually intrinsic, since they explicitly depend on layout). -- GitHub Notification of comment by dbaron Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1431#issuecomment-316237648 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 19 July 2017 00:32:17 UTC