- From: Brian Birtles via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2017 23:42:36 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
I'm ok with progression too, although, like `offset`, it does feel a little abstract to me. To me easing gives more of a sense of rate of change over time/distance. That is, `gradient-easing` makes more sense to me than `gradient-progression` since I'd expect the latter to take keywords like `reverse` and `alternate`, i.e. what _direction_ does it progress in, as opposed to the _rate_ at which it progresses. Then again provided it never shows up in any property or attribute name, maybe it doesn't really matter what we name this module. -- GitHub Notification of comment by birtles Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1577#issuecomment-314280505 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 10 July 2017 23:42:41 UTC