- From: Loirooriol via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2017 04:55:42 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
I don't know many the use cases, it was just a quick idea which seemed more coherent than a standalone `scale-down` flag. However, I think wanting to scale images up is a frequent thing, usually handled via `height: auto; width: auto; min-height: 100%; min-width: 100%`. The concrete object size would be like in `height: 100%; width: 100%; object-fit: cover scale-up` in my proposal. `none` would clamp both as a minimum and maximum, so it wouldn't matter which one of `fill`, `contain` or `cover` is used. The `none` case could also be treated separately, without `fill`, `contain` nor `cover`. `fill` = `fill scale-any` `contain` = `contain scale-any` `cover` = `cover scale-any` `none` = `fill none` = `contain none` = `cover none` `scale-down` = `contain scale-down` And `scale-up` could default to `cover scale-up`, and `scale-any` to `fill scale-any`. -- GitHub Notification of comment by Loirooriol Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1578#issuecomment-312549507 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 3 July 2017 04:55:48 UTC