- From: Patrick H. Lauke via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2017 11:38:44 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
alternatively, for backwards-compatibility with existing content, perhaps having a new modifier for the value part to indicate it's "excluding", thus allowing authors to choose which one they want to make "excluding" (assuming browsers would then infer the rest from context, i.e. if it's used for a `min-` then the value with modifier results in a `>` only, and in case of `max-` with modifier value a `<` only). Spitballing, based on mathematical notation for intervals, maybe the `]` and `[` characters (where `[` could be assumed as the default for backwards compat)? Something like `min-width: ]320px` / `max-width: [320px` perhaps? -- GitHub Notification of comment by patrickhlauke Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/984#issuecomment-275086620 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 25 January 2017 11:38:50 UTC