- From: Yves Lafon via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2017 13:33:18 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Yes, I saw that it was defined as a "Flexible Length", but the fact that it is not a "length" despite its name (unlike "relative length" and "absolute length") would deserve a better definition in the spec (and ideally be moved to the css-values spec), as in other specifications, it is quite common to use "length" and not "length, but not of the flexible kind, as it is not a real length". -- GitHub Notification of comment by ylafon Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/955#issuecomment-273777066 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 19 January 2017 13:33:24 UTC