- From: ebraminio via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 07 Jan 2017 15:54:48 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Interesting that all my insist about was actually about Arabic script. As a Safari user that uses Arabic script sites on everyday basis, IMHO, this actually helps the situation with Arabic script as without dots this two will be less distinguishable and I think Kahled can agree with me that with skip: ink, this two valid Persian/Arabic words will be more legible and distinguishable on small and big sizes: Actual text: سیب سبب Safari: ![image](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/833473/21742899/7f096d58-d50d-11e6-90de-f23c2ab58af4.png) Chrome: ![image](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/833473/21742900/8b487668-d50d-11e6-8fdb-45a0a2f605a5.png) Firefox: ![image](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/833473/21742912/b1b2d35c-d50d-11e6-8895-7938410c04ea.png) I think the situation with Safari is quite good and I prefer to use Safari when I use a Macbook actually. The font used to render is popular Persian web font, [Iranian Sans](https://fontlibrary.org/en/font/iranian-sans) that doesn't contain ascender/descender info at all. Anyway, if Khaled don't agree with me on this, I know github.com/w3c/alreq would be a better forum to discuss about it, I couldn't register on its ML yet but I will try with another email. Obviously, I will agree with consensus of its members if they conclude web is better without `skip: ink` for Arabic, but I don't personally really think so. -- GitHub Notification of comment by ebraminio Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/727#issuecomment-271091463 using your GitHub account
Received on Saturday, 7 January 2017 15:54:54 UTC